From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. Timme

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 13, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-CV- 02261-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 13, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-CV- 02261-BNB

10-13-2011

ERIC K. CHAPMAN, Applicant, v. RAE TIMME, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Applicant, Eric K. Chapman, is a prisoner in the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections who currently is incarcerated at the Fremont Correctional Facility in Canon City, Colorado. He initiated this action by filing pro se an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on August 29, 2011.

In an order filed on September 6, 2011, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland ordered Mr. Chapman to cure certain enumerated deficiencies in this case within thirty days. Specifically, Mr. Chapman was directed to submit an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on the court-approved form. Mr. Chapman was also directed to file a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 on the court-approved form and a current certified copy of his prisoner's trust fund statement. He was informed that the § 1915 motion and affidavit was only necessary if the $5.00 filing fee was not paid in advance. The September 6 order warned Mr. Chapman that if he failed to cure the designated deficiencies within the time allowed, the action would be dismissed without further notice.

On September 9, 2011, Mr. Chapman paid the $5.00 filing fee in a habeas corpus action. Mr. Chapman, however, has failed to file an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on the court-approved form, as directed by the September 6 Order. Therefore, Mr. Chapman has failed within the time allowed to cure the designated deficiencies. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the failure of Applicant, Eric K. Chapman, to comply with the order to cure dated September 6, 2011. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot.

BY THE COURT:

LEWIS T. BABCOCK

Senior Judge, United States District Court

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

Eric K. Chapman

Prisoner No. 137905

Fremont Correctional Facility

PO Box 999

Canon City, CO 81215- 0999

I hereby certify that I have mailed a copy of the ORDER and JUDGMENT to the above-named individuals on October 13, 2011.

GREGORY C. LANGHAM, CLERK

By:_____

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Chapman v. Timme

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 13, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-CV- 02261-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Chapman v. Timme

Case Details

Full title:ERIC K. CHAPMAN, Applicant, v. RAE TIMME, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-CV- 02261-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 13, 2011)