From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. Schultz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 6, 1975
47 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

March 6, 1975

Appeal from the Monroe Special Term.

Present — Marsh, P.J., Moule, Mahoney, Del Vecchio and Witmer, JJ.


Order reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: The issues presented on this appeal are identical with those before the court in Ziemba v. Sternberg ( 45 A.D.2d 230). In accordance with our holding therein, the order of Special Term, made prior to that decision, should be reversed and defendant's motion denied. All concur, Mahoney, J. under the constraint of Ziemba v. Sternberg ( supra)


Summaries of

Chapman v. Schultz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 6, 1975
47 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Chapman v. Schultz

Case Details

Full title:ALICE CHAPMAN, Appellant, v. JOHN H. SCHULTZ, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 6, 1975

Citations

47 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Sorkin v. Lee

They allege in their complaint that the doctor who performed that vasectomy did so carelessly and that as a…

Martinez v. Hartford Hospital

Subsequent decisions of the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, have reaffirmed the ruling in Ziemba…