From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 4, 2011
11-CV-1814(ENV) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 4, 2011)

Opinion

11-CV-1814(ENV) (LB)

11-04-2011

THOMAS CHAPMAN, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEW YORK (NYS DIVISION OF PAROLE); M. RAYNOR, BROOKLYN #4 PAROLE OFFICER, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND CIVIL

JUDGMENT

VITALIANO, United States District Judge:

By order dated September 7, 2011 and entered September 14, 2011, plaintiff's claims against the State of New York and the New York State Division of Parole were dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's claim against Parole Officer M. Raynor was dismissed without prejudice with leave to replead within 30 days of the date of the order's entry. More than 30 days have elapsed, and plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court's order. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to close this case and, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that final judgment be, and hereby is, entered for defendants. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915 (a)(3) that any appeal from this Memorandum and Judgment would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

ERIC N. VITALIANO

United States District Judge

Dated: Brooklyn, New York

November 1, 2011


Summaries of

Chapman v. New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 4, 2011
11-CV-1814(ENV) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Chapman v. New York

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS CHAPMAN, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEW YORK (NYS DIVISION OF PAROLE)…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 4, 2011

Citations

11-CV-1814(ENV) (LB) (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 4, 2011)

Citing Cases

Hatcher v. Doe

See Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf, 506 U.S. 139, 142-47 (1993); McGinty v. New York, 251 F.3d…