From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. L.E. Waterman Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1910
138 App. Div. 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)

Opinion

May, 1910.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ.


Without passing upon the right of the plaintiff to a permanent injunction, we think, upon the record as it stands, that the court was justified in refusing to grant a temporary injunction, leaving it to the court upon the trial to give such judgment as the evidence would justify. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Chapman v. L.E. Waterman Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1910
138 App. Div. 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for

Chapman v. L.E. Waterman Company

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC E. CHAPMAN and WILLIAM L. CHAPMAN, Appellants, v . L.E. WATERMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1910

Citations

138 App. Div. 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)