From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2292 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2292 JAM CKD P

09-20-2011

KEVIN LAMONTE CHAPMAN, Petitioner, v. RICK HILL, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On March 18, 2011, respondent filed a motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 21). On June 7, 2011, petitioner was granted a thirty (30) day extension of time to file opposition, but no opposition has been filed. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days petitioner file an opposition to respondent's pending motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Chapman v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2292 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Chapman v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN LAMONTE CHAPMAN, Petitioner, v. RICK HILL, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2292 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2011)