Claimant provided no authority to support that this context was sufficiently analogous to the instant case for the opinion to lend support to her argument. Claimant argued that it was improper for the ALJ to rely on the fact that Claimant had only “minimal treatment” for her medical impairments in assessing the consistency factor, citing Chapman v. Colvin, No. 0:14-cv-168-KKC, 2016 WL 1060354, at *2 (E.D. Ky. March 16, 2016). (DN 15, at PageID # 3754.)