From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. Bradley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 19, 2019
Case 3:18-cv-53-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2019)

Opinion

Case 3:18-cv-53-KRG-KAP

09-19-2019

LAMAR C. CHAPMAN, III, Plaintiff, v. ERIC BRADLEY, WARDEN, F.C.I. LORETTO, et al., Defendants


Memorandum Order

Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case, ECF no. 12, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.§ 636 and Local Civil Rule 72. The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation at ECF no. 13 on December 3, 2018, recommending that the motion be denied without prejudice to filing the objections allegedly sent in July 2018.

The plaintiff was notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1), he had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff filed objections, ECF no. 14, that I have reviewed de novo.

After review of the record of this matter, the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2018, it is

ORDERED that the Motion to Reopen Case, ECF no. 12, is denied.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

KIM R. GIBSON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Notice by U.S. Mail to:

Lamar C. Chapman III, Reg. No. 16900-424

F.C.I. Forrest City Low

P.O. Box 9000

Forrest City, AR 72336


Summaries of

Chapman v. Bradley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 19, 2019
Case 3:18-cv-53-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2019)
Case details for

Chapman v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:LAMAR C. CHAPMAN, III, Plaintiff, v. ERIC BRADLEY, WARDEN, F.C.I. LORETTO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 19, 2019

Citations

Case 3:18-cv-53-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2019)