From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. Bee Cnty. Jail Med. Provider

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Sep 27, 2022
Civil Action 2:22-CV-00117 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 27, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:22-CV-00117

09-27-2022

CALEB AARON CHAPMAN, Plaintiff, v. BEE COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL PROVIDER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO RETAIN CASE AND DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS

NELVA GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On August 23, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton issued a “Memorandum and Recommendation to Retain Case and Dismiss Certain Claims” (M&R, D.E. 16). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed.

When no timely objection to a magistrate judge's M&R is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge's M&R. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).

Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge's M&R (D.E. 16), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. The Court RETAINS Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims seeking monetary relief against Family Nurse Practitioner Flynn and Nurse Joyce in their individual capacities.

The Court further ORDERS that: (1) Defendants Bee County Jail Medical Provider and Bee County Jail are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (2) Plaintiff's claims against Defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (3) Plaintiff's claims seeking injunctive relief against Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as moot; and (4) Plaintiff's remaining claims against the remaining Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim pursuant to §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1).

ORDERED.


Summaries of

Chapman v. Bee Cnty. Jail Med. Provider

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Sep 27, 2022
Civil Action 2:22-CV-00117 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Chapman v. Bee Cnty. Jail Med. Provider

Case Details

Full title:CALEB AARON CHAPMAN, Plaintiff, v. BEE COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL PROVIDER, et…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Sep 27, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 2:22-CV-00117 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 27, 2022)