From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapel Ridge Invs., L.L.C. v. Petland Leaseholding Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
Jun 3, 2013
CAUSE NO. 1:13-CV-146 (N.D. Ind. Jun. 3, 2013)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 1:13-CV-146

06-03-2013

CHAPEL RIDGE INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. PETLAND LEASEHOLDING COMPANY, INC., an Ohio corporation; THE UNKNOWN OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, AND SHAREHOLDERS OF PETLAND LEASING COMPANY, INC.; and PETLAND, INC., an Ohio corporation; Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

This case was removed to this Court from the Allen Superior Court by Defendants based on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (Docket # 2, 7.) Along with Petland Leaseholding Company, Inc. ("PLC"), and Petland, Inc., PLC's unknown officers, directors, and shareholders are also Defendants in this case. "But because the existence of diversity jurisdiction cannot be determined without knowledge of every defendant's place of citizenship, 'John Doe' defendants are not permitted in federal diversity suits." Howell ex rel. Goerdt v. Tribune Entm't Co., 106 F.3d 215, 218 (7th Cir. 1997) (citations omitted). Defendants appear to be aware of this, stating in their Amended Notice of Removal that "PLC represents to the Court that none of its officers, directors, or shareholders are citizens of the State of Indiana." (Am. Notice of Removal ¶ 4(d).)

Defendants' Amended Notice of Removal, however, is inadequate because Plaintiff Chapel Ridge Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, is a citizen of California, not Indiana, as its sole member, Johann Lippert, is a California citizen. (Am. Notice of Removal ¶ 6(a)(ii)); see Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998) ("[T]he citizenship of an LLC for purposes of . . . diversity jurisdiction is the citizenship of its members."). As such, whether any of PLC's officers, directors, or shareholders are citizens of Indiana is irrelevant to the jurisdictional analysis. Instead, the Court must be advised of whether any of them are California citizens.

Consequently, Defendants are ORDERED to supplement the record by filing a Second Amended Notice of Removal on or before June 17, 2013, informing the Court of whether any of PLC's officers, directors, or shareholders are citizens of California.

SO ORDERED.

_________________

Roger B. Cosbey,

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Chapel Ridge Invs., L.L.C. v. Petland Leaseholding Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
Jun 3, 2013
CAUSE NO. 1:13-CV-146 (N.D. Ind. Jun. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Chapel Ridge Invs., L.L.C. v. Petland Leaseholding Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHAPEL RIDGE INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. PETLAND LEASEHOLDING…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

Date published: Jun 3, 2013

Citations

CAUSE NO. 1:13-CV-146 (N.D. Ind. Jun. 3, 2013)