From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chaparro v. Bartos

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Dec 4, 2009
No. CV-03-701 PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Dec. 4, 2009)

Opinion

No. CV-03-701 PHX-DGC.

December 4, 2009


ORDER


United States Magistrate Judge Charles Pyle issued a report and recommendation ("R R") recommending that Petitioner's habeas corpus petition be denied. Dkt. #68. Petitioner filed an objection and Respondents filed a response. Dkt. ##75, 87.

On November 23, 2009, Petitioner filed a motion seeking a 30-day extension of the time to file a reply. Dkt. #91. Respondents oppose the motion on the ground that reply briefs are not authorized under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. #92. Because Petitioner is proceeding pro se, and in the interest of justice, the Court will grant Petitioner's motion. Petitioner shall have until December 23, 2009 to file a reply. No further extensions will be granted. The Court will rule on the R R and the pending motions (Dkt. ##72, 76, 77) once the time for filing a reply has expired.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Petitioner's motion for an extension of time to file reply (Dkt. #91) is granted.
2. Petitioner shall have until December 23, 2009 to file a reply. No further extensions will be granted.


Summaries of

Chaparro v. Bartos

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Dec 4, 2009
No. CV-03-701 PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Dec. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Chaparro v. Bartos

Case Details

Full title:Abelardo Chaparro, Petitioner, v. Ivan Bartos, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Dec 4, 2009

Citations

No. CV-03-701 PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Dec. 4, 2009)