From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chao Xia Li v. Wells Fargo Bank

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 13, 2022
22 Civ. 2282 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 13, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 2282 (PAE)

07-13-2022

CHAO XIA LI, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:

The Court having been advised by plaintiff that all claims as between plaintiff and defendant Experian Information Solutions (“Experian”), have been settled in principle, Dkt. 44, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to plaintiff's right to reopen the action within 45 days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within 45 days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same 45-day period to be “so ordered” by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(C) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Experian as a party and to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Chao Xia Li v. Wells Fargo Bank

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 13, 2022
22 Civ. 2282 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Chao Xia Li v. Wells Fargo Bank

Case Details

Full title:CHAO XIA LI, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 13, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 2282 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 13, 2022)