From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chao v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Dec 15, 2021
No. 2021-01288 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 15, 2021)

Opinion

2021-01288 Index 710052/2015

12-15-2021

George Chao, appellant, v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent, ABM Industries, Inc., et al., respondents; Bombadier Transit Corporation, third-party defendant-respondent.


M280466 AFA/

SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, J.P. COLLEEN D. DUFFY FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 18, 2020, which was deemed dismissed pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(a). Motion by the appellant pro se pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1250.10(c) to vacate the dismissal of the appeal, to reinstate the appeal, and for poor person relief.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to vacate the dismissal of the appeal and to reinstate the appeal are denied; and it is further, ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for poor person relief is denied as academic.

HINDS-RADIX, J.P., DUFFY, CONNOLLY and GENOVESI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chao v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Dec 15, 2021
No. 2021-01288 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Chao v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.

Case Details

Full title:George Chao, appellant, v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Dec 15, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-01288 (N.Y. App. Div. Dec. 15, 2021)