From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chao v. Crater Lake of Medford, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Aug 28, 2006
Civil No. 06-156-CO (D. Or. Aug. 28, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-156-CO.

August 28, 2006


ORDER


On July 31, 2006, Magistrate Judge Cooney filed his Findings and Recommendation (docket # 49), recommending that Defendant Sue Li's motion (# 34) to set aside entry of default (docket # 29) be granted; that Plaintiff's motion (docket # 32-1) for entry of default judgment as to Defendant Song, Inc., be denied as premature; and that Plaintiff's motion (docket # 32-2) for entry of default as to defendant Sue Li be denied as moot.

Plaintiff has filed objections. The matter is now before me for de novo review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). I find no error.

Conclusion

Magistrate Judge Cooney's Findings and Recommendation (docket # 49) are adopted. Defendant Sue Li's motion (# 34) to set aside entry of default is granted. Plaintiff's motion (docket # 32-1) for entry of default judgment as to Defendant Song, Inc., is denied as premature. Plaintiff's motion (docket # 32-2) for entry of default against dfendant Sue Li is denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Chao v. Crater Lake of Medford, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Aug 28, 2006
Civil No. 06-156-CO (D. Or. Aug. 28, 2006)
Case details for

Chao v. Crater Lake of Medford, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ELAINE CHAO, Secretary of Labor, Plaintiff, v. CRATER LAKE OF MEDFORD…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Aug 28, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 06-156-CO (D. Or. Aug. 28, 2006)