From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Channon v. Liberation Distribution LLC

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Nov 5, 2024
1:24-cv-01124-SCY (D.N.M. Nov. 5, 2024)

Opinion

1:24-cv-01124-SCY

11-05-2024

MATTHEW CHANNON, Plaintiff, v. LIBERATION DISTRIUTION, LLC, and INSPERITY, INC., d.b.a. ADMINISTAFF COMPANIES INC GP LTD, Defendants.


ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENCY AND ORDER GRANTING PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC CASE FILING

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on pro se Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form), Doc. 2, filed November 4, 2024, and Plaintiff's Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing, Doc. 3, filed November 4, 2024.

Order to Cure Deficiency

Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis using an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form)” (“Short Form Application”). See Doc. 2, filed November 4, 2024. The Short Form Application does not provide sufficient information for the Court to determine whether a plaintiff is unable to pay the required fees. The Court requires plaintiffs seeking to proceed without prepaying fees to file the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (“Long Form Application”). Failure to file a Long Form Application within twenty-one (21) days from entry of this Order or failure to follow all instructions in the Long Form Application may result in denial of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

Motion for Permission to File Electronically

The Court grants Plaintiff permission to file electronically in this case only. See Guide for Pro Se Litigants at 13, District of New Mexico (October 2022) (“approval to electronically file documents within a case must be granted by the presiding judge for each case in which the pro se litigant wishes to file using their CM/ECF account”). The Court will revoke permission to file electronically if Plaintiff abuses his electronic filing privilege or fails to comply with the rules and procedures in the District of New Mexico's Guide for Pro Se Litigants and the District of New Mexico's CM/ECF Administrative Procedures Manual. Account registration forms, procedure manuals, and other information can be obtained at the Court's website at http://www.nmd.uscourts.gov/filing-information. This Order only grants Plaintiff permission to participate in CM/ECF; Plaintiff is responsible for registering to become a participant. See CM/ECF Administrative Procedures Manual, District of New Mexico (Revised June 2024).

Case Management

Generally, pro se litigants are held to the same standards of professional responsibility as trained attorneys. It is a pro se litigant's responsibility to become familiar with and to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (the “Local Rules”).

Guide for Pro Se Litigants at 4, United States District Court, District of New Mexico (October 2022). The Local Rules, the Guide for Pro Se Litigants and a link to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are available on the Court's website: http://www.nmd.uscourts.gov.

Compliance with Rule 11

The Court reminds Plaintiff of his obligations pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Yang v. Archuleta, 525 F.3d 925, 927 n. 1 (10th Cir. 2008) (“Pro se status does not excuse the obligation of any litigant to comply with the fundamental requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure.”). Rule 11(b) provides:

Representations to the Court. By presenting to the court a pleading, written motion, or other paper--whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating it--an attorney or unrepresented party certifies that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances:
(1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation;
(2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new law;
(3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and
(4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). Failure to comply with the requirements of Rule 11 may subject Plaintiff to sanctions, including monetary penalties and nonmonetary directives. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(c).

IT IS ORDERED that:

(i) Plaintiff shall, within 21 days of entry of this Order, file an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). Failure to timely file a Long Form Application may result in may result in denial of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
(ii) The Clerk shall send to Plaintiff a copy of this Order and an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form).
(iii) Plaintiff's Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing, Doc. 3, filed November 4, 2024, is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Channon v. Liberation Distribution LLC

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Nov 5, 2024
1:24-cv-01124-SCY (D.N.M. Nov. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Channon v. Liberation Distribution LLC

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW CHANNON, Plaintiff, v. LIBERATION DISTRIUTION, LLC, and INSPERITY…

Court:United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Nov 5, 2024

Citations

1:24-cv-01124-SCY (D.N.M. Nov. 5, 2024)