From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chanler v. Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 21, 2000
275 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

September 21, 2000.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry Cozier, J.), entered June 30, 1999, which, inter alia, granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Joseph O. Giaimo, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Carl A. Binder, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Rosenberger, Lerner, Andrias, Friedman, JJ.


Plaintiffs' action to recover real estate commissions on a theory of unjust enrichment, not having been commenced within six years of the accrual of the claims, is time-barred (see, CPLR 213;compare, e.g., Whalen v. Gerzof, 76 N.Y.2d 914).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Chanler v. Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 21, 2000
275 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Chanler v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:JACK P. CHANLER, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOB ROBERTS, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 21, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
713 N.Y.S.2d 681

Citing Cases

SHAN v. CITIBANK, N.A.

He should have filed his lawsuit then, but did not. The statute of limitations are: six years for breach of…

Malmsteen v. Berdon, LLP

A claim of unjust enrichment is governed by a six-year statute of limitations under New York's residual…