From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chanin v. Chanin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 1975
50 A.D.2d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

November 18, 1975


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 30, 1975, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, and the case disposed of otherwise as hereinafter set forth. We find indications of violent conduct on the part of defendant-appellant husband, not entirely refuted, which arguably renders it necessary that the family apartment, claimed to be solely owned by the husband, be surrendered to the wife pending trial. (Cf. Lerner v Lerner, 21 A.D.2d 861; also, see Domestic Relations Law, § 234.) Nor is the husband's sole, ownership completely unquestioned. Further, there may well be psychiatric overtones in the claimed conduct of the wife. These emergent circumstances point to the necessity of speedy trial. To that end, we direct immediate transfer of the case to Trial Term, New York County, to be set down for trial within 30 days of service of a copy of the order entered hereon. Trial has been too long delayed. Should plaintiff not be ready for trial as indicated, defendant will be privileged to seek relief anew.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Markewich, Kupferman, Capozzoli and Lynch, JJ.


Summaries of

Chanin v. Chanin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 1975
50 A.D.2d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Chanin v. Chanin

Case Details

Full title:RIMA M. CHANIN, Respondent, v. GERALD M. CHANIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1975

Citations

50 A.D.2d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Lolli-Ghetti v. Lolli-Ghetti

In our view this limited direction was an improvident exercise of discretion. Although there is some dispute…

Billips v. Billips

The foregoing provision authorizes Supreme Court to restore a spouse who has been locked out of marital…