Opinion
Civil Action No. H-99-2184
November 27, 2000
ORDER
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Dkt. # 15) and motion for enlargement of time instanter (Dkt. # 19). After considering the motions, response, reply, and applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that Plaintiff's motions should be DENIED.
Inspite of Plaintiff's protestations otherwise, Plaintiff is required to pay income taxes. See Davis v. United States, 742 F.2d 171, 172 (5th Cir. 1984); Lonsdale v. Commissioner, 661, F.2d 71, 72 (5th Cir. 1981). Plaintiff has already filed his motion for reconsideration and replied to Defendant's response. Consequently, the Court sees no reason to grant a further extension of time, especially since the law in this area is well established.
It is so ORDERED.