From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chaney v. Dickerson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 12, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3375 KJN (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-3375 KJN (TEMP) P.

January 12, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The application attacks a conviction issued by the Los Angeles County Superior Court. While both this court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in Los Angeles County. Id. at 499 n. 15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

DATED: January 11, 2011


Summaries of

Chaney v. Dickerson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 12, 2011
No. CIV S-10-3375 KJN (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Chaney v. Dickerson

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL DUANE CHANEY, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN DICKERSON, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 12, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-3375 KJN (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2011)