From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chaney v. Clark

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 11, 2022
EDCV 20-0017-JGB (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2022)

Opinion

EDCV 20-0017-JGB (LAL)

03-11-2022

STEVEN ROBERT CHANEY, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HONORABLE JESUS G. BERNAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Petitioner's Objections lack merit for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.


Summaries of

Chaney v. Clark

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 11, 2022
EDCV 20-0017-JGB (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Chaney v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN ROBERT CHANEY, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 11, 2022

Citations

EDCV 20-0017-JGB (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2022)