From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chaney v. Baughman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cv-06125-FMO-KES (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:19-cv-06125-FMO-KES

01-31-2020

JARRED E. CHANEY, Petitioner, v. DAVID BAUGHMAN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 15). No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed, and the deadline for filing such objections has passed. The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition without prejudice based on Petitioner's failure to prosecute. DATED: January 31, 2020

/s/_________

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Chaney v. Baughman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cv-06125-FMO-KES (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2020)
Case details for

Chaney v. Baughman

Case Details

Full title:JARRED E. CHANEY, Petitioner, v. DAVID BAUGHMAN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:19-cv-06125-FMO-KES (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2020)