From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chanel, Inc. v. Does

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Mar 31, 2009
Civil No. 08-413 (RCL) (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-413 (RCL).

March 31, 2009


MEMORANDUM


The Court will, in a separate Order issued today, grant plaintiff's Motion [44] for Entry of Default Judgment. The Clerk of the Court entered default as to all defendants on February 18, 2009. All defendants have failed to respond to the entry of default.

Several of the default notices were returned as undeliverable after being mailed to certain defendants. This does not affect the Court's ability to enter default, as it is each party's responsibility to keep the Court appraised of any changes of address. See Local Civ. R. 11.1. Also, notice of the entry of default against defendant Tore Britbil was not mailed because he has no fixed address known by the Court. Again, the defendant — having been personally served on December 6, 2008 ( see Return of Service [33]) — is responsible for appraising the Court of an address for correspondence, and defendant Britbil's failure to do so does not preclude default judgment.


Summaries of

Chanel, Inc. v. Does

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Mar 31, 2009
Civil No. 08-413 (RCL) (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2009)
Case details for

Chanel, Inc. v. Does

Case Details

Full title:CHANEL, INC., Plaintiff, v. VARIOUS JOHN DOES NOS. 1-300, and XYZ…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Mar 31, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 08-413 (RCL) (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2009)

Citing Cases

Tech. Advancement Grp., Inc. v. Ivyskin, LLC

" Florida Physician's Ins. Co., Inc. v. Ehlers, 8 F.3d 780. 784 (11th Cir. 1993). Accord Chanel, inc. v.…

Sec. Title Guarantee Corp. of Balt. v. 915 Decatur St NW, LLC

The failure to deliver an entry of default does not preclude default judgment. See Chanel, Inc. v. Various…