From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chandler v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-03831-SC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-03831-SC

10-18-2011

ROBERT CHANDLER, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROSEMARY S. CHANDLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a California corporation, and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION a/k/a FANNIE MAE, Defendants.

Michael Ng (237915) Kelly A. Corcoran (260268) KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP Steven A. Skalet (pro hac vice) Craig L. Briskin (pro hac vice) MEHRI & SKALET, PLLC Jean Constantine-Davis (pro hac vice) AARP FOUNDATION LITIGATION Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Class


Michael Ng (237915)

Kelly A. Corcoran (260268)

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP

Steven A. Skalet (pro hac vice)

Craig L. Briskin (pro hac vice)

MEHRI & SKALET, PLLC

Jean Constantine-Davis (pro hac vice)

AARP FOUNDATION LITIGATION

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Class

CLASS ACTION


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES TO

FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO

DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

STIPULATION

WHEREAS Plaintiff's Complaint was served on August 5, 2011; WHEREAS Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss was filed on October 4, 2011;

WHEREAS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is not set for hearing until January 13, 2012; WHEREAS the parties require additional time to submit papers in opposition and in reply to the Motion to Dismiss;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Plaintiff shall have until November 1, 2011 to file his opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss;

2. Defendants shall have until November 15, 2011 to file their reply to the opposition.

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP

MEHRI & SKALET, PLLC

AARP FOUNDATION LITIGATION

Kelly A. Corcoran

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Class

SEVERSON & WERSON

Rebecca S. Saelao

Attorneys for Defendants

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE

ASSOCIATION a/k/a FANNIE MAE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having considered the stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the extensions are hereby GRANTED.

1. Plaintiff shall have until November 1, 2011 to file his opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss;

2. Defendants shall have until November 15, 2011 to file their reply to the opposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Samuel Conti

I, Kelly A. Corcoran, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Rebecca S. Saelao, counsel for Defendants has concurred in this filing.

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP

Kelly A. Corcoran

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Class


Summaries of

Chandler v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-03831-SC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Chandler v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT CHANDLER, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROSEMARY S. CHANDLER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-03831-SC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)