From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chandler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 15, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-03831-SC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-03831-SC

11-15-2011

ROBERT CHANDLER, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROSEMARY S. CHANDLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a California corporation, and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION a/k/a FANNIE MAE, Defendants.

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP MEHRI & SKALET, PLLC AARP FOUNDATION LITIGATION KELLY A. CORCORAN Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Class SEVERSON & WERSON MARK D. LONERGAN JOHN B. SULLIVAN REBECCA S. SAELAO Attorneys for Defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION a/k/a FANNIE MAE KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP


MICHAEL NG (237915)

KELLY A. CORCORAN (260268)

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP

STEVEN A. SKALET (pro hac vice)

CRAIG L. BRISKIN (pro hac vice)

MEHRI & SKALET, PLLC

JEAN CONSTANTINE-DAVIS (pro hac vice)

AARP FOUNDATION LITIGATION

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Class

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING

DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY TO

DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

AND ADVANCING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

STIPULATION

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed his Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss on November 1, 2011;

WHEREAS Defendants desire additional time to reply to Plaintiff's opposition;

WHEREAS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is set for hearing on January 13, 2012;

WHEREAS the initial case management conference is set for February 10, 2012;

WHEREAS for the convenience of the Court and the parties, and to preserve resources; NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Defendant shall have until November 22, 2011 to file their Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss;

2. The initial case management conference shall be advanced to January 13, 2012, to coincide with the Motion to Dismiss hearing.

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP

MEHRI & SKALET, PLLC

AARP FOUNDATION LITIGATION

KELLY A. CORCORAN

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Class

SEVERSON & WERSON

MARK D. LONERGAN

JOHN B. SULLIVAN

REBECCA S. SAELAO

Attorneys for Defendants

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE

ASSOCIATION a/k/a FANNIE MAE

[PROPOSEDl ORDER

Having considered the stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the extensions are hereby GRANTED.

1. Defendant shall have until November 22, 2011 to file their Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss;

2. The initial case management conference shall be advanced to January 13, 2012, to coincide with the Motion to Dismiss hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Samuel Conti

I, Kelly A. Corcoran, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND ADVANCING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Rebecca S. Saelao, counsel for Defendants has concurred in this filing.

KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP

KELLY A. CORCORAN

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Class


Summaries of

Chandler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 15, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-03831-SC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Chandler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT CHANDLER, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROSEMARY S. CHANDLER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 15, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-03831-SC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)