From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chandler v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Apr 14, 2020
597 S.W.3d 821 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 107361

04-14-2020

Kevin T. CHANDLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

For Appellant: Alexandria A. Shah, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101. For Respondent: Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.


For Appellant: Alexandria A. Shah, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

For Respondent: Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kevin T. Chandler appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Chandler v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Apr 14, 2020
597 S.W.3d 821 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Chandler v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kevin T. CHANDLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Apr 14, 2020

Citations

597 S.W.3d 821 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)