From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chandler v. Dunn

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1875
50 Cal. 15 (Cal. 1875)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, County of Sacramento.

         Ejectment to recover lots six, seven and eight in the block bounded by R and S and Fourth and Fifth streets, city of Sacramento.

         The defendants recovered judgment, and the plaintiff appealed.

         COUNSEL

          Hamilton & Dunlap, for the Appellant.

         Ed. M. Martin and McCune & Welty, for the Respondents.


         JUDGES: Niles, J.

         OPINION

          NILES, Judge

         The plaintiff's title is derived through a sale for delinquent taxes for the fiscal year 1868-9--the defendant's through a sale for taxes for the year 1865-6. The facts are substantially the same as in the case of Anderson v. Rider (46 Cal. 138), in which we held that " the title acquired under a tax sale for taxes of a subsequent year must prevail over a title founded on a sale for the taxes of a previous year." (Dougherty v. Henarie , 47 Cal. 10.)

         Judgment reversed. Remittitur forthwith.


Summaries of

Chandler v. Dunn

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1875
50 Cal. 15 (Cal. 1875)
Case details for

Chandler v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:L. C. CHANDLER v. J. J. DUNN et al.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 1, 1875

Citations

50 Cal. 15 (Cal. 1875)

Citing Cases

Woodill & Hulse Electric Co. v. Young

It is so held almost universally and has been so decided in this state. ( Anderson v. Rider, 46 Cal. 134,…

Larson v. Gilderoy

The sale of land for the taxes of one year does not affect, as a general rule, the liability of the land to…