From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chandler v. Booth

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1858
11 Cal. 342 (Cal. 1858)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, County of Sacramento.

         COUNSEL:

         Wallace & Rayle, for Appellant.

          Winans & Hyer, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Baldwin, J., concurring.

         OPINION

          TERRY, Judge

         Plaintiff in a suit against James Allen attached certain moneys in the hands of defendant. After the judgment against Allen the defendant was examined, and having denied his indebtedness to Allen, this suit was instituted by permission of the Court.

         It appears that Allen placed in the hands of defendant a State Controller's warrant for the sum of $ 1,600, with directions to sell the same, and pay the proceeds to the " boys in the office," meaning the employes in a printing office conducted by Allen.

         It did not appear that any portion of the proceeds had been so paid; that defendant had ever become liable to the hands in the office, by their knowledge of and consent to the arrangement between defendant and Allen, or that Allen was indebted to such hands in an amount equal or approximating to the sum in the hands of defendant.

         We think the evidence produced by the plaintiff sufficient prima facie to entitle him to a verdict, and that the Court erred in ordering a non-suit.

         Judgment reversed and cause remanded.


Summaries of

Chandler v. Booth

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1858
11 Cal. 342 (Cal. 1858)
Case details for

Chandler v. Booth

Case Details

Full title:CHANDLER v. BOOTH

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1858

Citations

11 Cal. 342 (Cal. 1858)

Citing Cases

Alvord v. Spring Valley Gold Co.

The party deceived must be ignorant of the true state of facts, and without convenient means of knowledge.…