Opinion
No. 03:13-cv-02014-ST
06-03-2014
ORDER
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation (#36) on April 18, 2014, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendants' motions to dismiss and dismiss the Complaint with prejudice. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings & Recommendation [36]. Accordingly, Defendants' motions to dismiss [11, 15] are granted and the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge