Summary
rejecting argument that motion to strike paragraph of complaint containing EEOC findings was a "premature motion in limine" where defendants timely filed a Rule 12(f) motion
Summary of this case from Fitchett v. Spartech LLCOpinion
No. 10-2440
08-11-2011
JAMES H. CHANCEY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NORTH AMERICAN TRADE SCHOOLS, INCORPORATED; MATT DALY; EFC TRADE, INCORPORATED, IV, Defendants - Appellees.
James H. Chancey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Hermann Strong, VENABLE, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:10-cv-00032-WDQ)
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James H. Chancey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Hermann Strong, VENABLE, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James H. Chancey, Jr., appeals the district court's order granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We affirm.
With respect to Chancey's claim of race discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and his claim of retaliatory discharge, in violation of Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006), we review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing the facts and drawing reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Bonds v. Leavitt, 629 F.3d 369, 380 (4th Cir.) petition for cert. filed, 79 U.S.L.W. 3686 (May 31, 2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chancey v. N. Am. Trade Sch. Inc., No. 1:10-cv-00032-WDQ (D. Md. Nov. 17, 2010).
We deny as moot appellee's motion to strike filed in this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED