From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pui-Kwong Chan v. Baizhen Yang

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 27, 2017
2016-1214 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 27, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1214

01-27-2017

PUI-KWONG CHAN, MAY SUNG MAK, YUN WANG, Appellants v. BAIZHEN YANG, SONGJIAN WANG, Appellees

ROBERT BAUER, Bauer Law Offices, Erie, PA, argued for appellants. Also represented by ALBERT W. CHAN, Law Offices of Albert Wai-Kit Chan, PLLC, Whitestone, NY. STEPHANIE SCRUGGS, Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 106,025.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT BAUER, Bauer Law Offices, Erie, PA, argued for appellants. Also represented by ALBERT W. CHAN, Law Offices of Albert Wai-Kit Chan, PLLC, Whitestone, NY. STEPHANIE SCRUGGS, Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MOORE, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 27, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Pui-Kwong Chan v. Baizhen Yang

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 27, 2017
2016-1214 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 27, 2017)
Case details for

Pui-Kwong Chan v. Baizhen Yang

Case Details

Full title:PUI-KWONG CHAN, MAY SUNG MAK, YUN WANG, Appellants v. BAIZHEN YANG…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 27, 2017

Citations

2016-1214 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 27, 2017)