From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chan v. Rosenberg

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 6, 1971
445 F.2d 1399 (9th Cir. 1971)

Opinion

No. 25959.

August 6, 1971.

Appeal from an Order of the United States Board of Immigration Appeals.

Gordon G. Dale (argued), of Gould Dale, Santa Ana, Cal., for petitioner.

L. Douglas Brown, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Carolyn M. Reynolds, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., Stephen M. Stuffin, INS, San Francisco, Cal., Jozseph Sureck, Director, INS, San Pedro, Cal., John N. Mitchell, Atty. Gen., of U.S., Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before KOELSCH, DUNIWAY, and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.


Petitioner seeks reversal of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings to enable her to apply for suspension of deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1254(a)(1). The Board ruled that petitioner, who had remained in the United States in a protected status, had not presented facts excepting her from the doctrine articulated in Matter of Lee (B.I.A. 11 I. N. Dec. 649).

In Asimakopoulos v. INS (9th Cir. 1971) 445 F.2d 1362 (No. 26,616, 1971), we overruled Matter of Lee because it conflicted with section 1254(a)(1).

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views expressed in Asimakopoulos.


Summaries of

Chan v. Rosenberg

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 6, 1971
445 F.2d 1399 (9th Cir. 1971)
Case details for

Chan v. Rosenberg

Case Details

Full title:Angela Ching-Yee CHAN, Petitioner, v. George K. ROSENBERG, District…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 6, 1971

Citations

445 F.2d 1399 (9th Cir. 1971)