"To prevail on its claims under the Lanham Act for trademark infringement, counterfeiting and false designation of origin, plaintiff must demonstrate that, '(1) it owns a valid and protectable trademark, and (2) the defendant used in commerce a similar mark without authorization in a manner likely to cause consumer confusion, deception, or mistake.'" Chan Luu, Inc. v. Guang Gao, No. CV 13-2997 FMO (JCX), 2014 WL 12567141, at *4 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2014) (citing Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Liu, 489 F.Supp.2d 1119, 1122 (C.D. Cal. 2007)); Rearden LLC v. Rearden Commerce, Inc., 683 F.3d 1190, 1202 (9th Cir. 2012) ("To prevail on its Lanham Act trademark claim, a plaintiff "'must prove: (1) that it has a protectible ownership interest in the mark; and (2) that the defendant's use of the mark is likely to cause consumer confusion.'")