Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00425-AP
06-05-2012
TAMMI L. CHAMPLIN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.
For Plaintiff : Gail C. Harriss GAIL C. HARRISS, LLC 450 S. Camino del Rio, Suite 201 Durango, CO 81301 For Defendant : JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney WILLIAM G. PHARO Assistant United States Attorney District of Colorado
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Gail C. Harriss
GAIL C. HARRISS, LLC
450 S. Camino del Rio, Suite 201
Durango, CO 81301
For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
MICHAEL HOWARD
Office of General Counsel
Social Security Administration
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: February 17, 2012
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: March 23, 2012
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: May 16, 2012
4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
Plaintiff states: To the best of her knowledge the Record is complete.
Defendant states: To the best of his knowledge, the Record is complete.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Plaintiff states: None anticipated
Defendant states: None anticipated.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
Plaintiff states: To the best of her knowledge, this case does not involve unusual claims or defenses.
Defendant states: To the best of his knowledge, this case does not involve unusual claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
Plaintiff states: None anticipated
Defendant states: None anticipated.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: July 16, 2012
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: August 15, 2012
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: August 30, 2012
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiff's Statement: Oral Argument is not requested.
B. Defendant's Statement: Oral Argument is not requested.
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
11. OTHER MATTERS
IN ADDITION TO FILING AN APPROPRIATE NOTICE WITH THE CLERK'S OFFICE, COUNSEL MUST FILE A COPY OF ANY NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL, NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL, OR NOTICE OF CHANGE OF COUNSEL'S ADDRESS OR TELEPHONE NUMBER WITH THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THIS CASE.
IN ADDITION TO FILING AN APPROPRIATE NOTICE WITH THE CLERK'S OFFICE, A PRO SE PARTY MUST FILE A COPY OF A NOTICE OF CHANGE OF HIS OR HER ADDRESS OR TELEPHONE NUMBER WITH THE CLERK FO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THIS CASE.
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.
BY THE COURT:
John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
For Plaintiff:
__________________
Gail C. Harriss
GAIL C. HARRISS, LLC
Attorney for Plaintiff
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
William G. Pharo
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
Michael Howard
Office of General Counsel
Social Security Administration
Attorneys for Defendant