From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chamniss v. Tucker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Jan 11, 2013
Case No.: 3:11cv566/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:11cv566/RV/EMT

01-11-2013

ROY CHAMNISS, Petitioner, v. KEN TUCKER, Respondent.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated December 11, 2012 (doc. 27). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

_________________

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Chamniss v. Tucker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Jan 11, 2013
Case No.: 3:11cv566/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Chamniss v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:ROY CHAMNISS, Petitioner, v. KEN TUCKER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Jan 11, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 3:11cv566/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 11, 2013)