From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chamness v. Speckman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 24, 1923
217 P. 192 (Okla. 1923)

Opinion

No. 13714

Opinion Filed July 24, 1923.

Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 5.

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Mark L. Bozarth, Judge.

From a judgment in favor of Speckman Osenbaugh, a copartnership composed of A.F. Speckman and M.E. Osenbaugh, W.A. Chamness and others appeal. Dismissed.

C.S. Fenwick, and Caruthers Irvin, for plaintiffs in error.

E.F. Maley, for defendants in error.


This is an appeal from the action of the district court of Okmulgee county, Okla., in rendering judgment in favor of the defendants in error. The cause was duly reached for hearing upon the docket of this court, submitted and assigned for the preparation of an opinion. Upon an examination of the record it appears that neither party has filed a brief in the case, although the time for so doing has long since expired.

In these circumstances, the appeal of the plaintiffs in error must be dismissed for want of prosecution.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Chamness v. Speckman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 24, 1923
217 P. 192 (Okla. 1923)
Case details for

Chamness v. Speckman

Case Details

Full title:CHAMNESS et al. v. SPECKMAN et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 24, 1923

Citations

217 P. 192 (Okla. 1923)
217 P. 192

Citing Cases

Stigletts v. McDonald

In Thomas v. Tilley, 147 Ala. 189, 41 So. 854 the same rule was enunciated. In the case of Szabo, et al., v.…