Opinion
No. 3:14-cv-01876-PK
04-16-2015
WILLIAM CHAMBERS, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, PAT GARRETT, and JOSH McCARTHY, Defendants.
ORDER HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation [23] on February 9, 2015, in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [4] Plaintiff's claims against them. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
I have carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and conclude there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings & Recommendation [23], and therefore, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [4] is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 16 day of April, 2015.
/s/_________
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge