From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chambers v. Thomas Roulston, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 1, 1925
214 App. Div. 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Opinion

July, 1925.

Appeal from State Industrial Board.


The evidence failed to show and the findings omit to state the precise nature and extent of the disfigurement found. Without such evidence and such a finding we are unable to say that the disfigurement was "serious" and "permanent," and, therefore, cannot affirm the award. All concur. Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event.


Summaries of

Chambers v. Thomas Roulston, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 1, 1925
214 App. Div. 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
Case details for

Chambers v. Thomas Roulston, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent. LEO CHAMBERS, Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1925

Citations

214 App. Div. 825 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Citing Cases

Matter of Sorgi v. Siegfried Constr. Co.

Without such evidence and such a finding we are unable to say that the disfigurement was `serious' and…