From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chambers v. Terrell

Supreme Court of Texas
Jul 14, 1982
639 S.W.2d 451 (Tex. 1982)

Opinion

No. C-1179.

July 14, 1982.

Appeal from the 173rd Judicial District Court, Henderson County, Jack H. Holland, J.

Kugle, Douglas Skelton, Henry T. Skelton, Athens, for petitioner.

John W. Key, Jr., Willis D. Moore, Athens, for respondent.


This suit was brought for termination of parental rights and for the adoption of a child of the parents. Only the termination of parental rights is before us.

After signing an affidavit relinquishing possession, the mother, without delay, changed her mind; and she resisted termination. The trial court ordered termination.

The Court of Appeals reversed that judgment and dismissed the petition for termination. A reason assigned was that there was no evidence to support the finding of the trial court that termination was in the best interest of the child. 630 S.W.2d 800.

There is not a point attacking this "no evidence" holding; and we regard that as dispositive of the case.

The holding of the Court of Appeals that there must be "clear and convincing evidence" for a "voluntary" termination was unnecessary. The trial court, sitting without a jury, did not use a lesser standard.

We are not to be understood as approving the holding of the Court of Appeals that the affidavit of relinquishment was void because the attorney who acted as the notary to take the affidavits had a "strong financial and beneficial interest." Among other things, no financial interest appears in the record. The point is reserved.

The writ of error is refused, no reversible error.


Summaries of

Chambers v. Terrell

Supreme Court of Texas
Jul 14, 1982
639 S.W.2d 451 (Tex. 1982)
Case details for

Chambers v. Terrell

Case Details

Full title:Jim Joe CHAMBERS, et al., Petitioners, v. Brenda Lee TERRELL, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Jul 14, 1982

Citations

639 S.W.2d 451 (Tex. 1982)

Citing Cases

Baby Girl T., in Interest of

In Tweedy's sole point of error, she asserts the documents supporting and authorizing the final judgment…

Martin v. Mooney

The question before us is whether he is disqualified from taking appellant's acknowledgment. Appellant…