From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chambers v. Klinefelter

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Sep 5, 2023
1:23-cv-00502 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 5, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-00502

09-05-2023

ERIC A. CHAMBERS, Petitioner v. SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFELTER, Respondent


ORDER

Yvette Kane, District Judge

AND NOW, on this 5th day of September, 2023, upon consideration of the petition (Doc. No. 1) for writ of habeas corpus, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Petitioner's “motion to dismiss” Respondent's response (Doc. No. 9) is GRANTED IN PART;
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE;
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to TERMINATE the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and the District Attorney of Dauphin County as Respondents in this action;
4. A certificate of appealability shall not issue; and
5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Chambers v. Klinefelter

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Sep 5, 2023
1:23-cv-00502 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Chambers v. Klinefelter

Case Details

Full title:ERIC A. CHAMBERS, Petitioner v. SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFELTER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 5, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-00502 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 5, 2023)