From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chambers v. Allen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 15, 2019
Case No. 5:17-cv-01353-MWF-KES (C.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 5:17-cv-01353-MWF-KES

02-15-2019

ROSCOE CHAMBERS, Plaintiff, v. DR. ALLEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, including the initial Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 75) and the Amended Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 79) of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the recommendations to which objections have been made (Dkt. 77, 80, 81). (The Court deemed Plaintiff's "Reply" as additional objections (Dkt. 81).) The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 59) is GRANTED and judgment shall be entered dismissing the Second Amended Complaint without prejudice and without leave to amend due to Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. DATED: February 15, 2019

/s/_________

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Chambers v. Allen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 15, 2019
Case No. 5:17-cv-01353-MWF-KES (C.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2019)
Case details for

Chambers v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:ROSCOE CHAMBERS, Plaintiff, v. DR. ALLEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 15, 2019

Citations

Case No. 5:17-cv-01353-MWF-KES (C.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2019)