From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chamberlain v. Sturma

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 20, 1967
226 A.2d 834 (N.J. 1967)

Opinion

Argued February 13, 1967 —

Decided February 20, 1967.

On appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 94 N.J. Super. 1.

Mr. Arthur J. Blake argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson Dunne, attorneys; Mr. H. Curtis Meanor, of counsel).

Mr. Ralph S. Heuser argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Heuser Heuser, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Chamberlain v. Sturma

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 20, 1967
226 A.2d 834 (N.J. 1967)
Case details for

Chamberlain v. Sturma

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL CHAMBERLAIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RONALD STURMA, DEFENDANT…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 20, 1967

Citations

226 A.2d 834 (N.J. 1967)
226 A.2d 834

Citing Cases

Watts v. Procopio

See Kozma, supra, 412 N.J. Super. at 326-27. We also reject plaintiff's reliance on Chamberlain v. Sturma, 94…

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services

N.J. Soc'y for the Prevention of the Cruelty to Animals v.Bd. of Educ. of E. Orange, 49 N.J. 15, 227 A.2d 506…