From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chamberlain v. Nielsen

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 22, 2010
Case No. 10-10676 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 22, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 10-10676.

July 22, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff, Patrick Chamberlain, filed a complaint alleging that while he was a pretrial detainee at the Midland County Jail, various County employees violated his constitutional rights. The Court subsequently referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan for all pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

On June 16, 2010, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's remaining medical care claims because he failed to identify the John Doe defendants within the time specified by the Court's order. See Doc. No. 6. The Magistrate Judge informed the parties that objections to the R R must be filed within fourteen days of service and that a party's failure to file objections would waive any further right of appeal. See R R at 3-4; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d)(2).

Because no objection has been filed in this case, the parties waived their right to review and appeal. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Chamberlain v. Nielsen

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 22, 2010
Case No. 10-10676 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Chamberlain v. Nielsen

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK CHAMBERLAIN, Plaintiff, v. JERRY NIELSEN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 22, 2010

Citations

Case No. 10-10676 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 22, 2010)

Citing Cases

Townsend v. Sisto

The court held that while this might state a negligence claim, it did not rise to the level of a condition…