From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chala v. Thornell

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Apr 23, 2024
No. CV-23-01488-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Apr. 23, 2024)

Opinion

CV-23-01488-PHX-ROS

04-23-2024

Francisco V. Chala, Petitioner, v. Ryan Thornell, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Honorable Roslyn O. Silver, Senior United States District Judge

On March 14, 2024, Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) concluding Petitioner Francisco V. Chala's petition for writ of habeas corpus was untimely by more than twenty years. (Doc. 14). Petitioner did not file any objections. Therefore, the R&R will be adopted in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the R&R (Doc. 14) is ADOPTED. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Respondents and close this case.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED leave to proceed in forma pauperis and a certificate of appealability are DENIED because dismissal of the petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find the ruling debatable, and because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.


Summaries of

Chala v. Thornell

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Apr 23, 2024
No. CV-23-01488-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Apr. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Chala v. Thornell

Case Details

Full title:Francisco V. Chala, Petitioner, v. Ryan Thornell, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Apr 23, 2024

Citations

No. CV-23-01488-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Apr. 23, 2024)