From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chaisson v. Grounds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
Sep 18, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13cv54 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13cv54

09-18-2014

QUERONDE CHAISSON v. DAWN GROUNDS, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT

The Plaintiff Queronde Chaisson, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. §1983 complaining of alleged violations of his constitutional rights in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division. This Court ordered that the case be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges.

Chaisson complained of an alleged use of force incident occurring May 19, 2012, at the Telford Unit of TDCJ-CID. The Magistrate Judge ordered the Defendants to answer and a motion for summary judgment was filed. After review of the motion and the summary judgment evidence, as well as Chaisson's motion for summary judgment and the other pleadings in the case, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that the Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted and that the lawsuit be dismissed.

Chaisson received a copy of this Report on August 28, 2014, but filed no objections thereto; accordingly, he is barred from de novo review by the district judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings and summary judgment evidence in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3243 (1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge's Report are filed, the standard of review is "clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law.") It is accordingly

ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge (docket no. 92) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further

ORDERED that the Defendants' motion for summary judgment (docket no. 63) is hereby GRANTED and the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Finally, it is

ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this action are hereby DENIED.

It is SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 18th day of September, 2014.

/s/_______

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Chaisson v. Grounds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
Sep 18, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13cv54 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2014)
Case details for

Chaisson v. Grounds

Case Details

Full title:QUERONDE CHAISSON v. DAWN GROUNDS, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

Date published: Sep 18, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13cv54 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2014)

Citing Cases

Loyd v. Jackson Par. Corr. Ctr.

While the undersigned is sympathetic to Plaintiff's plight, Plaintiff does not plead substantial harm…