From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chagolla v. Diaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 16, 2019
No. 2:19-cv-1039 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2019)

Opinion

No. 2:19-cv-1039 CKD P

10-16-2019

RAYMUNDO CHAGOLLA, Plaintiff, v. RALPH DIAZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed August 27, 2019, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: October 16, 2019

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
chag1039.fta


Summaries of

Chagolla v. Diaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 16, 2019
No. 2:19-cv-1039 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2019)
Case details for

Chagolla v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:RAYMUNDO CHAGOLLA, Plaintiff, v. RALPH DIAZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 16, 2019

Citations

No. 2:19-cv-1039 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2019)