Opinion
No. ED 99574.
2014-02-4
Naren CHAGANTI, Appellant, v. Martini HAYNES, Jr., Respondent.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Ted House, Judge. Naren Chaganti, Town & Country, MO, pro se. Mitchell D. Johnson, St. Charles, MO, for respondent.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Ted House, Judge.
Naren Chaganti, Town & Country, MO, pro se. Mitchell D. Johnson, St. Charles, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Attorney Naren Chaganti (Plaintiff) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County granting the motion for new trial filed by Plaintiff's former client, Martini Haynes, Jr. (Defendant), and denying Plaintiff's motion for new trial on damages only. Plaintiff argues the trial court erred in: (1) granting Defendant's motion for new trial on the ground that the jury was improperly instructed; (2) granting Defendant's motion for new trial on the grounds that Plaintiff's breach of contract and action on account claims were inconsistent and that Plaintiff should have elected one before submission of the case to the jury; (3) dismissing Plaintiff's unjust enrichment claim; and (4) denying Plaintiff's motion for a new trial on damages.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).