From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chafin v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION
Jan 16, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-1706 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 16, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-1706

01-16-2015

CHRISTOPHER CHAFIN, Plaintiff, v. MIKE CLARK, former Administrator of the Western Regional Jail; OFFICER MATTHEW ADKINS; OFFICER KELLY; OFFICER BARBARA MANNON; OFFICER SPARKS; OFFICER CHAUNCEY MAYNARD; OFFICER BLANKENSHIP; OFFICER CHRIS CARTER; SERGEANT FLEMING; NURSE DESTINY WARD, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the Court GRANT Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (ECF NO. 104); GRANT Motion of Nurse Destiny Ward to Dismiss (Second) Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (ECF No. 106); GRANT Defendants Michael Clark and Christopher Carter's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 108); DENY the Motion of Nurse Destiny Ward to Dismiss (Second) Amended Complaint and Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 92), as moot; DISMISS the second amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 41.1; and REMOVE this action for the docket of the Court. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations. The Court notes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations was mailed to the only known address for Plaintiff and was returned as undeliverable, as were several earlier mailings in this case.

Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (ECF NO. 104); GRANTS Motion of Nurse Destiny Ward to Dismiss (Second) Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (ECF No. 106); GRANTS Defendants Michael Clark and Christopher Carter's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 108); DENIES the Motion of Nurse Destiny Ward to Dismiss (Second) Amended Complaint and Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 92), as moot; DISMISSES the second amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 41.1; and REMOVES this action for the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties.

ENTER: January 16, 2015

/s/_________

ROBERT C. CHAMBERS, CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Chafin v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION
Jan 16, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-1706 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Chafin v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER CHAFIN, Plaintiff, v. MIKE CLARK, former Administrator of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION

Date published: Jan 16, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-1706 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 16, 2015)