From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chadwick v. Graham

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 27, 2019
No. 19-6870 (4th Cir. Sep. 27, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-6870

09-27-2019

STEVE C. CHADWICK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD J. GRAHAM, JR., Defendant - Appellee.

Steve Carl Chadwick, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00596-RDB) Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steve Carl Chadwick, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steve C. Chadwick seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. Chadwick argued in his notice of appeal, and the record suggests, that he did not receive timely notice of the entry of the district court's dismissal order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6)(A). Because the 30-day appeal period is jurisdictional, Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007), we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to determine whether to reopen the time to file an appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED


Summaries of

Chadwick v. Graham

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 27, 2019
No. 19-6870 (4th Cir. Sep. 27, 2019)
Case details for

Chadwick v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:STEVE C. CHADWICK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD J. GRAHAM, JR.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 27, 2019

Citations

No. 19-6870 (4th Cir. Sep. 27, 2019)