From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chadwell v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 3, 2012
2011-3174 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 3, 2012)

Opinion

2011-3174

02-03-2012

KURT CHADWELL, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent, AND OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Intervenor.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in DA300A090680-I-I.

ON MOTION


ORDER

Kurt Chadwell moves to compel the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board") to produce to him the complete administrative record of his appeal before the Board. Separately, Chadwell seeks an extension of time, until February 10, 2012, to file his initial brief. The Board did not respond to either motion.

On August 9, 2011, this court received the Board's certified list of documents in the administrative record of Chadwell's appeal to the Board, submitted pursuant to Federal Circuit Rule 17. Chadwell states that he requested a copy of these documents on August 15, 2011. He states that he subsequently received a compact disc from the Board, purporting to include an electronic copy of the "complete record." According to Chadwell, he recently discovered that the disc did not include all of the documents identified on the Board's certified list.

All the documents Chadwell identifies by number as missing from the disc correspond to documents identified by the certified list as submissions by the Appellant, i.e., by Chadwell himself. Chadwell has not asserted that he lacks copies, albeit not on the disc provided by the Board, of these documents. Rather, Chadwell avers that he should not be expected to file his brief "until after Respondent has provided Petitioner with a complete copy of the administrative record."

Because Chadwell asserts only that he lacks a copy from the Board of these documents, rather than that he lacks any copies of these documents, he has not demonstrated a harm that would justify further consideration of his motion to compel. In any event, as noted in the court's Guide for Pro Se Petitioners, paragraph # 11, requests for portions of the record must be directed to the Board.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to compel is denied.

(2) The motion for an extension of time is granted. Chadwell's initial brief is due on or before February 10, 2012. No further extensions should be anticipated.

FOR THE COURT

________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Kurt Chadwell

Jeffrey Gauger, Esq.

Matthew F. Scarlato, Esq.

s23


Summaries of

Chadwell v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 3, 2012
2011-3174 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Chadwell v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:KURT CHADWELL, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 3, 2012

Citations

2011-3174 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 3, 2012)