Opinion
No. B281874.
10-17-2018
MELODY CHACKER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al., Defendants and Respondents.
[Modification of opinion [27 Cal.App.5th 351, ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___], upon denial of rehearing.]
THE COURT. — IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed on September 19, 2018, be modified as follows: On page 15, in the second sentence of the second full paragraph [27 Cal.App.5th 358, advance report, 1st par., line 3], the following new footnote number 6 is added immediately after the comma:
Hart v. Clear Recon Corp. (2018) 27 Cal.App.5th 322 [___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___] (Hart) analyzed a provision identical to section 9 and construed it essentially as we have; the Hart case did not analyze the import of a provision identical to section 14 in the trust deed here because it concluded the plaintiffs in that case were not "borrowers" and thus the provision could not be invoked by the successor to the lender. (Id. at p. 327, fn. 4.)
The addition of new footnote 6 will require renumbering of all subsequent footnotes.
Appellant's petition for rehearing is denied. There is no change in judgment.