From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chabad-Lubavitch of Mich. v. Schuchman

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 20, 2015
862 N.W.2d 648 (Mich. 2015)

Opinion

Docket No. 149567. COA No. 312037.

05-20-2015

CHABAD–LUBAVITCH OF MICHIGAN, and Congregation Beth Chabad, Plaintiffs–Appellees, Cross–Appellants, v. Dr. Dov SCHUCHMAN, Ken Kohn, Dorene Sobczak, Neil Craft, Andrea Feuereisen, Dale Goodman, Leah Ruby, Elimelech Silberberg, Sara Tugman Bais Chabad Torah, and Congregation Bais Chabad of West Bloomfield, Defendants–Appellants, Cross–Appellees.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals because there are no grounds on which to equitably toll the statute of limitations. MCL 600.5827 and MCL 600.5829 govern the accrual of the plaintiffs' claims. The statutory scheme is exclusive, and neither statute contains a provision to toll the period of limitations. See Trentadue v. Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler Co., 479 Mich. 378, 738 N.W.2d 664 (2007). The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants is considered, and it is DENIED as moot.

Bernstein, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Chabad-Lubavitch of Mich. v. Schuchman

Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 20, 2015
862 N.W.2d 648 (Mich. 2015)
Case details for

Chabad-Lubavitch of Mich. v. Schuchman

Case Details

Full title:CHABAD–LUBAVITCH OF MICHIGAN, and Congregation Beth Chabad…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: May 20, 2015

Citations

862 N.W.2d 648 (Mich. 2015)

Citing Cases

West v. City of Garden City

See Trentadue v. Buckler Lawn Sprinkler, 738 N.W.2d 664, 680 (Mich. 2007); Chabad-Lubavitch of Michigan v.…

Randy's Towing, LLC v. Charter Twp. of Oscoda

"The statutory scheme is exclusive," and Courts may not apply common law rules to toll limitations periods.…